The link Immigration Reform is a blog also about immigration reform, which includes videos, personal stories and economic analysis of the immigration reform’s impact.
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security speaks on how immigration can not be discussed until security of our countries borders are addressed first. Once a strong secure border is set, then issues such as legal migration can be ensured for people seeking citizenship and employment legally in the United States.
The article above is a timeline of events that has impacted border control in the U.S. as told from The New York Times. This timeline includes immigration impacts on the financial status of the U.S., border tensions with the U.S. and Mexico, drug seizures, border control legislation, racial profiling, etc.
The Department of Homeland Security concisely sums up why we support increased and stricter border control (also referred to as border security) when it said, “Protecting our borders from the illegal movement of weapons, drugs, contraband, and people, while promoting lawful entry and exit, is essential to homeland security, economic prosperity, and national sovereignty” (Homeland Security). In regards to immigration reform, we focus on the people aspect of the statement, as we think immigrants should not be able to just hop a fence for work in the country, but need to go through the proper and legal path of citizenship beforehand. The purpose of the border is to create and safe and fair environment for the US citizens and to keep out those who do not hold that privilege.
The nearly 700 miles of fence separating Mexico from the United States may stop vehicles full of illegal immigrants to cross, but minimally affects walkers’ access into the states. That said, the current count of more than 21,000 protection officers guarding the border by; land, sea and air is just not enough (Creating and Immigration System of the 21st Century).
Limiting the illegal access by transportation means (crossing the fence) should be the government’s first problem to attack. We acknowledge that total security is impossible and that just putting up more and more fences will not completely solve the problem. We simply think that while Congress argues back and forth to pass immigration laws, the country can keep the borders strong and illegal immigrants out. Even though the task asks for large sums of government funds, in the long run the payments will even out. This is because less non- US citizens will take away wages from tax paying citizens. The government does not help the situation by deporting travelers in the US on expired visas or incomplete/fake paperwork when they can leave and come right back because of the weak border patrol.
We are aligned with the Obama administration’s actions and stances taken on border security. We firmly think that it is near impossible to tackle the problems revolving immigration and make progress with the immigration reform without addressing the terms of border security. “We stengthened security at the borders so that we could finally stem the tide of illegal immigrants, President Barack Obama said on January 29, 2013. “We put more boots on the ground on the southern border than at any time in our history. And today, illegal crossings are down nearly 80 percent from their peak in 2000.” The increase in border security is a step in the right direction of immigration reform. Immigrants should only be allowed to enter the United States by obtaining citizenship and not by squeezing through the bordering fence.
Alden, E. (2012). Immigration and Border Control. Cato Journal, 32(1), 107-124. Retrieved November 9, 2013, from http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2012/1/cj32n1-8.pdf
Creating an Immigration System for the 21st Century. (n.d.). Continuing to Strengthen Border Security. Retrieved November 9, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/immigration/border-security
Garcia, A., Fitz, M., & Kelly, A. (n.d.). The “Border Security First” Argument: A Red Herring Undermining Real Security. Center for American Progress. Retrieved November 9, 2013, from http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/report/2011/03/29/9327/the-border-security-first-argument-a-red-herring-undermining-real-security/
Homeland Security. (n.d.). Border Security Overview. Retrieved November 9, 2013, from http://www.dhs.gov/border-security-overview
Immigration Policy Center’s writer Mary Giovagnoli expresses “an overview of the underlying legal system, the most basic principles of reform, the reasons behind them, and how they are likely to be reflected in coming legislation,” in the article “Overhauling Immigration Law: A Brieft History and Basic Principles of Reform.” In addition she outlines the debate between immigration enforcement and immigration reform.
The Huffington Post published the following article “Immigration Reform Group: Halting Deportations Would Hurt Effort,” on October 10, 2013. The article is an evaluation of the Bipartisan Policy Center Immigration Task Force’s proposed idea to extend the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to immigrated adults as protection against deportation. President Barack Obama and other government personnel found the idea as only a temporary fix and would just halt legislative efforts working on the immigration reform. The link to the article is below: